Lawrence Polk
2013-08-15 08:09:42 UTC
And you're gonna pay for it in the name of diversity. Prepare
for the black invasion.
Maybe your daughter or wife will have a black baby to show for
it soon.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/23/team-obama-steps-up-
racial-standards-for-neighborhoods/?intcmp=obnetwork
-- Shaun Donovan, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in
a July 16 speech to the NAACP about a new regulation and
database aimed at adding protected classes into predominantly
white neighborhoods.
The federal government is getting serious about pushing racial
and ethnic diversity into Americas neighborhoods--and is using
big data and big money to achieve its aims.
A new interactive database will help regulators, local housing
officials and individuals take action on a newly proposed
regulation that would require agencies to affirmatively
further the inclusion of minority residents in white
neighborhoods.
Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan announced
the database and regulation at last weeks NAACP convention,
saying the Obama administration was battling a quieter form of
discrimination that was just as harmful as long-outlawed
segregationist practices, like racially restrictive property
covenants.
The problem now, Donovan said, is that prospective minority
buyers are not being encouraged to move into predominantly white
neighborhoods with top-notch schools, government services and
amenities like grocery stories, etc.
The goal here then is to continue to prosecute at a high rate
incidences deemed proactively segregationist Donovan touted
25,000 individuals in the past 3 years being paid damages under
cases reported to the agency or independently investigated by
HUD but to add in a mandate for diversifying neighborhoods.
The old way was to punish exclusion. The new way is to punish
lack of inclusion.
The punishment is also different. Rather than fines and
prosecutions for those who sought to keep minorities out, the
new penalty would be a withholding of federal funds from local
and state government agencies dependent on HUD grants if they
fail to push greater diversity. The way those agencies interact
with developers, realtors, homeowners associations and others
would need to reflect the federal push for diversity.
The report card comes in the form of the new maps, which use
Census data to score communities on their racial and ethnic
concentrations, as well as income and community services. Check
out the Atlanta suburbs. South of Dekalb Avenue, the dots are
mostly green black residents and north of Dekalb Avenue, the
dots are mostly blue white residents.
HUD wants a more even distribution of blue and green dots in the
city and if you are planning a new subdivision or a realtor
looking to sign potential buyers up for FHA loans, the dot
distribution is something the Obama administration wants you to
be mindful of. And your local zoning board, county commission or
state real estate licensing bureau ought to be mindful too,
since their funding could depend on it.
As for what happens if you live in a place like Brooke County,
W.Va. where every dot is blue? Would the local housing authority
have to recruit non-blue dots to the county in order to not risk
federal funds? What if no holders of green dots want to come to
live on Apple Pie Ridge Rd.?
What about all the green dots at the intersection of West MLK
Blvd. and Crenshaw in Inglewood, Calif.? It will not presumably
be necessary for local city planners to recruit blue dots for
that map.
And what about the fact that the real estate purchases
increasingly begin on the color-blind Internet? Would one need
to declare the color of their dot before entering the search
terms?
At a time when Americans are on high alert about government
snooping and databases, and we have still unfolding before us at
the IRS a story about how readily power can be abused for
political aims, it would seem like a strange moment to put the
federal government in the dot distribution business.
for the black invasion.
Maybe your daughter or wife will have a black baby to show for
it soon.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/23/team-obama-steps-up-
racial-standards-for-neighborhoods/?intcmp=obnetwork
-- Shaun Donovan, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in
a July 16 speech to the NAACP about a new regulation and
database aimed at adding protected classes into predominantly
white neighborhoods.
The federal government is getting serious about pushing racial
and ethnic diversity into Americas neighborhoods--and is using
big data and big money to achieve its aims.
A new interactive database will help regulators, local housing
officials and individuals take action on a newly proposed
regulation that would require agencies to affirmatively
further the inclusion of minority residents in white
neighborhoods.
Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan announced
the database and regulation at last weeks NAACP convention,
saying the Obama administration was battling a quieter form of
discrimination that was just as harmful as long-outlawed
segregationist practices, like racially restrictive property
covenants.
The problem now, Donovan said, is that prospective minority
buyers are not being encouraged to move into predominantly white
neighborhoods with top-notch schools, government services and
amenities like grocery stories, etc.
The goal here then is to continue to prosecute at a high rate
incidences deemed proactively segregationist Donovan touted
25,000 individuals in the past 3 years being paid damages under
cases reported to the agency or independently investigated by
HUD but to add in a mandate for diversifying neighborhoods.
The old way was to punish exclusion. The new way is to punish
lack of inclusion.
The punishment is also different. Rather than fines and
prosecutions for those who sought to keep minorities out, the
new penalty would be a withholding of federal funds from local
and state government agencies dependent on HUD grants if they
fail to push greater diversity. The way those agencies interact
with developers, realtors, homeowners associations and others
would need to reflect the federal push for diversity.
The report card comes in the form of the new maps, which use
Census data to score communities on their racial and ethnic
concentrations, as well as income and community services. Check
out the Atlanta suburbs. South of Dekalb Avenue, the dots are
mostly green black residents and north of Dekalb Avenue, the
dots are mostly blue white residents.
HUD wants a more even distribution of blue and green dots in the
city and if you are planning a new subdivision or a realtor
looking to sign potential buyers up for FHA loans, the dot
distribution is something the Obama administration wants you to
be mindful of. And your local zoning board, county commission or
state real estate licensing bureau ought to be mindful too,
since their funding could depend on it.
As for what happens if you live in a place like Brooke County,
W.Va. where every dot is blue? Would the local housing authority
have to recruit non-blue dots to the county in order to not risk
federal funds? What if no holders of green dots want to come to
live on Apple Pie Ridge Rd.?
What about all the green dots at the intersection of West MLK
Blvd. and Crenshaw in Inglewood, Calif.? It will not presumably
be necessary for local city planners to recruit blue dots for
that map.
And what about the fact that the real estate purchases
increasingly begin on the color-blind Internet? Would one need
to declare the color of their dot before entering the search
terms?
At a time when Americans are on high alert about government
snooping and databases, and we have still unfolding before us at
the IRS a story about how readily power can be abused for
political aims, it would seem like a strange moment to put the
federal government in the dot distribution business.